Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeraEvents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

MeraEvents

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable company. Very similar article previously deleted and salted. Subsequently recreated as Meraevents and then moved here. $10 million companies ae not notable in any country. The refs, as would be anticipated, and just PR and notices.  DGG ( talk ) 04:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I've looked at this article a few times previously and I was thinking it might get better with a little time and some effort. However, several weeks, and many edits by many editors doesn't seem to have adequately improved it's promotional tone, nor the fact that there just doesn't seem to be adequate references to establish notability for this 7 year old company.  The fact that it was recreated directly from the source of the previously deleted article doesn't help matters at all either. Chrisw80 (talk) 08:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient in-depth coverage to satisfy WP:CORP. SmartSE (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches also only found expected coverage at News, questionable at this time at best. SwisterTwister   talk  07:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I pulled a bunch of sources from many different news sites, but after running them through WP:CORPDEPTH, I am only left with two sources (, and ). This does not meet the requirement of having significant coverage per WP:GNG and the primary criterion listed in WP:NCORP.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.