Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercadia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Plane (Magic: The Gathering). Feel free to change the target by later discussion if you want, but since this page already has a list of planes Mercadia should be merged there. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Mercadia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fictional world in a trading card game. The article is entirely unsourced since 2009, and a Google search does not show reliable secondary sources discussing this fictional world, as would be required for a separate article by WP:V. If and when reliable sources for the subject are found, it may be mentioned at Plane (Magic: The Gathering) and a redirect may be created there. But currently the article should not be redirected because it is not described at the target article, and per WP:V, the current content should not be merged because it is unsourced. Compare Articles for deletion/Phyrexia, where another article about a fictional world from this game was deleted for the same reasons.  Sandstein  06:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to Mercadian Masques and Plane (Magic: The Gathering). Unlike Phyrexia, this setting is not very important in the MTG fantasy universe. Cool Hand Luke 14:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Only to the extent the content is previously made verifiable, please. See my comment at Articles for deletion/Kamigawa‎‎.  Sandstein   16:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 15:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge per my comments on the related AfDs started by the same nom. Hobit (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 16:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Its clear what the outcome is but which of the suggested merge targets is correct? Suirely we can't merge to two articles and maintain attributation correctly. Please can we clarify and then this can close. Spartaz Humbug! 16:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.