Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercedes-AMG G 65


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Mercedes-AMG G 65

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I think the article is not needed. G class is a perfectly good page, and this is a minor variant. Saad Mirza (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * merge YBSOne (talk) 09:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Category:Mercedes-Benz G-Class. There are nine articles involved, but the others are not up for deletion. This one is sourced and informative. Why delete one and keep the others? Mercedes is globally known, and a top-of-the-line brand as auto brands go. — Maile  (talk) 01:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no sourced information on this model in the main G-Class page, which is already extremely long. It makes a lot sense to leave this so people can read about this variant, without having to scroll through that page to find a brief summary. In fact the G-class has so many variants over its history, having smaller article like this that is actually about one design is much more straightforward. The main article has really become about the decades long history of the G-class now. A75 (talk) 12:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment I am surprised there is no interest in merging the content with sources, as there is nothing on the main page right now, but a brief unsourced summary. I highly recommend preserving the content, its one of only a handful of V-12 suv in history. A75 (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep for the time being. The article is passably-written and suitably referenced, and the deletion rationale has no basis in policy. (That said, Mercedes-Benz G-Class is in desperate need of a page split - the W463 sections at minimum. After such a page split, it would probably made sense to merge this, but not now.) --Sable232 (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep G class is a broad topic, and this article is justified as a significant sub-type. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per all above. Svartner (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.