Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercedes De La Cruz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG WP:ACTOR, etc, at this time.

Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith. If you disagree with this decision, please take your objections and concerns to Deletion Review instead of my talk page. Thanks again and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 23:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Mercedes De La Cruz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article is about an actress that lacks the significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Perhaps a case of too soon for an article on Wikipedia. The article has been partially hidden as a potential copyright violation as the text is a rewording, at leat in parts, of the IMDB biography submitted by the actor herself, under the name Mercedes Gendron. My search for reliable sourcing under "Mercedes Gendron" turned up little. Searching under "Mercedes De La Cruz" turns up much more resultsm], but they are interviews, announcements, and insubstantial coverage. The sourcing in the article is the same sort of stuff. At the time of nomination, there are 6 sources.
 * 1) Bello magazine is an interview and does not contribute to notability.  The preamble to the interview is just a copy of the PR bio that is alo posted to IMDB.  As a side note, the only reader comment is from a "Starr Gendron" who is Merced's mother.
 * 2) This is announcement that she won a best actress award at the World Film Carnival Singapore.  That is not a significant award, and the film canrnival is a monthly event.
 * 3) Another interview.  Note that the preamble to the interview is just a copy of the PR profile posted to IMDB.
 * 4) Another interview
 * 5) Reporting on casting and not substantial coverage
 * 6) Insubstantial coverage from a source that is unclear on reliablity.  Most of the profile information has been just copied from a model mayhem profile.

She has had some roles in made for TV movies. But these are note really notable films. Other roles mentioned seemed to be worded to appear more substantial than they really are. For example, She had a role in "The WB's Supernatural opposite Jared Padalecki". A check with IMDB credits shows that she has been on two episodes. Once as "Porn Star 6", and another time as "Rabid #1". Whpq (talk) 19:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. nothing to see here. Oaktree b (talk) 01:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NBIO. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.