Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercedes PU106-Type Hybrid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mercedes AMG High Performance Powertrains. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Mercedes PU106-Type Hybrid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article simply recounts the rules and regulations dictating the power unit and lists things tangentially related to its performance, like the cars that used it in each season. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  08:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  08:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the Mercedes F1 article - maybe adding a sentence or 2 about the power unit in that article. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the Mercedes AMG High Performance Powertrains article. That's the more useful article to deal with Mercedes' performance as an engine/power unit supplier. There's not enough unique content to warrant a separate article for this particular power unit. It's simply a list of technical specifications (the most important of which are already listed in the articles on the cars that use it) and a list of awards (some which weren't even awarded to the power unit). Tvx1 15:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mercedes AMG High Performance Powertrains, as that's more sensible than Mercedes F1 for the reasons given above. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 5.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect as this is obvious enough. SwisterTwister   talk  06:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.