Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercer Quality of Living Survey (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Mercer Quality of Living Survey
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article relies on a single source which is not independent of the subject. I couldn't find any sources that are independent of the subject. I suggest if this article is not deleted, that it be merged into Most livable cities. Interstellarity (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Interstellarity (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was delete. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Previous discussions:
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is nothing more than a collection of photographs of cities (!) thrown together to support a text about the supposed notability of some quality ranking system of them. It's a pathetic attempt at article creation, with references that amount to practically nothing. Self-references won't do. -The Gnome (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.