Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercury Tilt Switch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Mercury Tilt Switch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This band appears to fail WP:BAND. Its albums were self-published by founder Andrew James McGarry on his occasional indie label Pet Piranha Records. The most prominent mentions I've found online have been an entry at the Internet Underground Music Archive, an album review in an e-zine by two other British musicians, a user-contributed bio from last.fm, and a trivial mention on a personal blog. There is no evidence that the band ever received an award or widespread radio play, or was the subject of a non-trivial published work. The title is unsuitable for redirection to Mercury switch because it would violate WP:NCCAPS. G. C. Hood (talk) 22:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * NCCAPS is for article titles, not for redirects; they are categorised by templates such as R from other capitalisation. Peter James (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 10.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 22:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:27, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's a little bit of web coverage out there, including two staff reviews of their singles from Drowned in Sound . There are three pieces from The Scotsman: a live review, an album review and a few paragraphs from when they supported Biffy. There's also an album review in The List. I think that just about scrapes the bar at WP:BAND and meets the WP:GNG. — sparklism hey! 09:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep As above. J 1982 (talk) 19:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * note to closing admin has made 6 identical keep as above !votes in 4 minutes. LibStar (talk) 12:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Bands with marginal notability clutter up our namespace and so should be deleted when their title would tend confuse readers looking for the primary topic. Andrew (talk) 10:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * That's not a reason to delete, only to move the article. Peter James (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep notability may be marginal, but coverage seems to be significant enough and on several occasions. Peter James (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep they have had significant coverage, as sparklism shows, plus often featured on Vic Galloway's radio shows. --Vclaw (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.