Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercury grove


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Mercury grove

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be a notable company. Once you start removing the non-independent sources (including "startupottawa.com"), there's really not much there outside of blogs. Singularity42 (talk) 19:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Notable Mentions in Globe and Mail, Techvibes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masonmike (talk • contribs) 19:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)  — Masonmike (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yet another company that designs, develops, and markets consumer based web applications, as well as offering professional services to a profile of corporate clients advertising on Wikipedia.  Also patent nonsense: Leaders in startup company community in Canada, Mercury Grove offers space in their offices to blossoming entrepreneurs to work and collaborate, and forgo the cost of office space for early stage startups.  (They rent out desk space too, apparently.)  Incidental mentions in one paragraph of a long unrelated story in the hometown paper and press releases based stories on tech websites do not establish that they've done anything history is going to remember. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete It appears to be one of many small businesses, which isn't sufficient for notability in itself, and the article doesn't provide any further justification of notability through sources Pi        (Talk to me!  ) 17:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.