Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meredith Stark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Meredith Stark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has only eight words including name and no reasons as to why is it notable. Only claim is that the person is a General Manager with CNBC.  Cheers AKS  06:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment The size of the article is not really an issue for AfD, nor what the article claims (unless that claim is false). Perhaps if you search a bit, sources can be found and instead of spending your time to take this to AfD, you could use it to expand the article. Whatever your inclination, though, you have repeatedly been pointed to WP:BEFORE. Hence, please tell us what efforts you have made to determine whether or not this person is notable or not and what the results of those efforts were. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * delete I searched, and could not find, any indication of this person's notability per WP:GNG. She seems to be just another executive, of which there are many - but I didn't find any news articles in RS that give a detailed profile of her, she is only mentioned in passing. Being head of an organization does not mean you are notable.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.