Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meri Awaaz Suno (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Meri Awaaz Suno
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable unreleased film that has already been created and deleted. See Articles for deletion/Meri Awaaz Suno.

This is an unreleased film, and the language in the film notability guidelines on films that are in production is poorly written, but films fall into three classes as to state of production:
 * 1. Films that have been produced, for which notability is based on reviews, reception, etc.
 * 2. Films that are in production, which are normally not notable unless production satisfies general notability.  This part of the guideline is often contentious.
 * 3. Films that have not begun production, coverage of which would be crystal ball gazing.

This appears to fall into the second class, but there is nothing in the article about production except a statement that it has started, which is not much.

Naïve Google search mostly is about Meri Aawaz Suno. If Meri Awaaz Suno were notable, hatnotes would be needed. But it isn't notable. It is just an incomplete film with a deleted article.

This article was nominated for deletion once, and was soft-deleted, and was promptly reposted by the same author, and was deleted as G4. I initially tagged it for another G4, but have reverted that, and will nominate it again. These reposts are tendentious. Recommend Extended-Confirmed protection so that, when the film is released, a reviewer can accept a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was soft delete. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Previous discussions:
 * Logs:,  ,  ,  ,  ,

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 01:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 10:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify: there's plausible value to the existing content if the film garners attention on its release. Delete as second choice. If it's deleted, ECP would be a good measure, but the repeated creator should be engaged in discussion so they know what problems they are causing and how to approach things in a better way. — Bilorv ( talk ) 23:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per Bilorv, except leaning delete first choice, draftify second. — Alalch Emis (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete for obvious reasons. Riteboke (talk) 08:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.