Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meria Heller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 16:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Meria Heller

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. PROD tag remover added one small source but edit summary said notability was still dubious. This BIO just doesn't cut the mustard. Existing sources are self-published, google searches would appear to be numerous but they end up as being more self-published stuff. She's a byline, not a subject. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 02:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional. As good as unsourced Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 04:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 02:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * DELETE. Oh my God, the article is just terrible, violating WP:RS, WP:N, WP:AUTO, WP:COI, WP:Single-purpose account and the list can go on and on.  It is a prime example of what doesn't belong on WP.  It even includes a list of self-published "books."  Bleh.  This atrocity should have been speedied a long time ago. Qworty (talk) 05:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is not significant coverage of her in reliable sources to establish notability.  GB  fan  07:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.