Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merkwelt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was a bold redirect to Consciousness per author's implicit request. ''' -- Pontificalibus (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Merkwelt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to be a notable term:, possibly original research -- Pontificalibus (talk) 09:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

The level of references clearly indicates there is enough use of the term to merit its inclusion, while it is a technical concept, it is a widely used one. Google searches are not a criteria for Wikipedia inclusion. How is this original research if it is referenced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danrules2 (talk • contribs) 09:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Why did you delete this and remove the tag when it specifically say Do Not Remove This Tag Until The Discussion Is Closed? D rew S mith  What I've done  09:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for doing that, but this process infuriates me when I have references to back its inclusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danrules2 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Having reviewed the references now added, I am not at all convinced the term is notable. Many of the referenced articles do not even include the term at all. There is nothing in the article that can't be included in articles on AI, perception etc.. -- Pontificalibus (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Could I then include the information in the AI article then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danrules2 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Fine just delete it then, I have added the content to the consciousness article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danrules2 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.