Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merlinscape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. consensus is clear. Mango juice talk 20:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Merlinscape
An article (mostly advertising) a game illegally stolen off the copyrighted game RuneScape by Jagex Ltd. The game has no "private servers" - all servers are run by Jagex, and some individuals decompile and copy the game's source code, creating illegal copies, such as the one advertised in this article. Agentscott00(talk contribs) 23:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per nom. Advert (CSD G11), non-notable (CSD A7), probable hoax and endorsing a copyright theft. CaptainVindaloo t c e 23:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: I accidentally typed CSD A7 as A11. Sorry about that. CaptainVindaloo t c e 18:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per both arguments already stated, RS accounts are regularly targetted by keyloggers and something like this seems like an ideal set-up for that purpose. Strongly suggest salting if possible, WP should not be used for advertising stolen material or stealing from RS players' accounts. QuagmireDog 00:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above Percy Snoodle 12:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete It's all been said. Lord Rasputin 18:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Why do people do this? -Amarkov babble 04:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Kick it to the end of New Zealand Wikipedia should not contain articles advertising illegal methods of scamming/hacking RuneScape or RuneScape accounts. If this server was particularly notable, I would reconsider my vote. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 06:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable, not worthy of an article. J.J.Sagnella 06:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable -- timdew (Talk) 09:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Not Notable -- Offensiveandconfusing 15:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.