Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merritt Lamb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  JGHowes   talk  01:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Merritt Lamb

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. The claims that he was the "founder of Scouting in West Michigan" and "the 13th Eagle Scout" in the U.S. are both unsourced. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 22:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. Mztourist (talk) 07:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep just added a number of sources. It should now meet WP:GNG. There are more out there, and the article needs copyediting, but it should be kept. --evrik (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep IMO twice over, meeting both GNG and SNG.  And this is not dependent on the two facts described in the nomination. North8000 (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Delete Not seeing much aside from local newspaper articles attesting to notability. I also did some cleanup on the article, including adding sources for the military career section, but remain unconvinced he has notability beyond West Michigan. Intothatdarkness 15:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ashley  yoursmile!  05:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The flaws in the article were addressed. The initial consensus was to keep. It is unnecessary to relist it twice. 19:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: AFD has been open for almost a month with no consensus
 * Comment Disagree. There are still concerns about GNG in my view. The individual MIGHT be locally notable, but I don't think he's more than that. Intothatdarkness 21:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * CommentGNG is about sourcing and does not require establishing outside-world famous-ness/notability. The SNG criteria provide an alternate "way in" and so per the guideline, the topic needs to satisfy only one of the two. Per my comment above, IMO it satisfies both, but, most relevant in this post is that meeting the sourcing criteria (GNG) alone is sufficient.North8000 (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lettlerhello • contribs 16:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I added more sources:

--evrik (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Responding to note above, per the guideline, the finding here is to see if there is a consensus to delete. If there is no consensus to delete (or consensus for another such action) the result is the status quo which is keep. North8000 (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is clearly no consensus to delete. I gave up being an admin. If I was still an admin, I would just have closed this as 'Keep'. Could some admin end this long time discussion. --Bduke (talk) 00:29, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.