Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mersalaayitten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to I (soundtrack). No consensus to keep and redirects are cheap. Philg88 ♦talk 10:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Mersalaayitten

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NSONG and WP:GNG Chamith   (talk)  03:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp; Chamith   (talk)  03:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)&thinsp;


 * Strong delete Unfortunately, an infobox only does not fall under CSD A3, though I believe it should. Since it does not qualify, than delete in the strongest possible terms for failure to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. And even if it DID satisfy those criteria, and it does not, delete for just being a ****ing infobox. If somebody wants it kept, write a ****ing proper article with text then. Safiel (talk) 05:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to I (soundtrack), the article on the movie soundtrack from which it is drawn. It's possible the song could pass notability test, but there is no point, with so little content. Even if built out a bit more, readers would likely be better served with content as a section within the soundtrack article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 08:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  14:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no references at all, let alone any reliable sources. Nothing suggests notability.--Rpclod (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.