Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesa Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Mesa Mall

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. Livna-Maor (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a shopping mall, so what. Fails WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:SPAM, WP:NOTE.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  02:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * May I suggest that when you feel the need to say "so what", you read WP:WHOCARES. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  03:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - awfully close to the generally accepted benchmark of 1Mill. sq.ft. WP:NOTDIR I dont believe is applicable as all 110 retailers are not listed, only the Majors. WP:NOTADVERTISING, WP:SPAM have been dealt with via editing, and so was the copyvio. I believe WP:N can be found for this one. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;  neuro  (talk)  00:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep this is sufficiently close to the usual standard. Not that we officially go by precedent, but we might a swell use it when there's nothing better to go on. And if all the 100 had been listed, there would have been a better remedy than deletion of the article, which is to remove the list of them, as we have consistently done to so many of these articles. DGG (talk) 05:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete We may not officially go by precedent, but if we're going to ignore that for the moment, it makes sense to adhere to our own standards. The mall is not >1 million sq ft, and doesn't seem notable for any other reason. Every mall is uniquely situated, doesn't mean it meets WP:N.  LOL thulu  06:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.