Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesika elastic loops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Mesika elastic loops

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced and no evidence of notbility. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 19:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete completely non notable, maybe even A11. buffbills7701 02:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete Two pages of webhits, all of which seem to say in one way or another that there's no sch thing. Mangoe (talk) 03:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Something made out. Google Search turned no reliable results.  Alex discussion ★ 09:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Administrator Note I have declined the speedy, as to be honest I found quite a few hits on Google and demonstrations on Youtube so it's not a WP:MADEUP. Pedro : Chat  11:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or failing that Redirect possibly to Invisible thread. I can't quite tell, but this looks like a proprietary type of invisible thread - see . Might be an implausible redirect however, and of course there's not exactly much to merge. It certainly doesn't appear to meet the WP:GNG in terms of needing a stand alone article. Pedro : Chat  11:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.