Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MessagePack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy relist. Davewild (talk) 15:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

MessagePack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for questionable notability since March 2012. I had a look for reliable sources myself and came up empty-handed. Unless someone can point to substantial coverage in independent sources, I suggest this article should be deleted. Psychonaut (talk) 09:31, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

3 years later, and MessagePack is perhaps more notable than when this was posted. See e.g. RubyInside. I have frequently seen it listed alongside Protocol Buffers, Avro, and JSON as a serialization format. Wackywendell (talk) 18:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.