Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messages Deleted


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Donald D23   talk to me  13:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Messages Deleted

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've done some major expansion to the article. There was a nice writeup in an academic press book, which is good. I found a review with ReelFilm, but for the life of me I can't remember if the site is usable or not. The other coverage is kind of more in passing to a degree and there are a lot of primary/interview sources. It's an interesting little piece of media in that it was apparently the last thing he wrote (that has been filmed so far) and because it was pirated online before it released, the film failed miserably and ultimately led to the demise of an entire production company since they'd sunk so much money into the movie. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I withdraw the nomination per User:ReaderofthePack’s improvements to the article. The Film Creator (talk) 11:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.