Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messianic Renewed Judaism

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 02:39, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Messianic Renewed Judaism
Unverifiable and non-notable micro-movement. All information in the article comes from members of the movement or its website; the small number of google hits lead to the website, or Wikipedia and its mirrors. Jayjg (talk) 8 July 2005 19:24 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 8 July 2005 19:24 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree, unverifiable and non-notable. -- M P er el ( talk 8 July 2005 19:49 (UTC)
 * Keep. I consider this article to be a borderline case, and my philosophy is, "when in doubt, don't delete."  I have seen this movement raise its head elsewhere - such as on a mainstream Messianic blog, where Julio Dam had a fringe presence. David Cannon 9 July 2005 03:41 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 9 July 2005 03:43 (UTC)
 * Delete per Jayjg. Dcarrano July 9, 2005 18:22 (UTC)
 * Delete What Jayjg said. I'm a moderator at Jews for Judaism, and I've never even heard of these guys until today.--Josiah 02:51, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I know my opinion and backing are weak... but, I think it should be kept. gren 04:54, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: A Google search for "Messianic Renewed Judaism" (with quotes) returns 241 results. "Julio Dam" (again with quotes) returns 878.  As such, I'm calling it out for non-notability. --  CABHAN   TALK   CONTRIBS  04:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, --Eliezer 06:42, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonnotable. That the only place anyone else has seen this is on a messianic blog where this movement's founder has a "fringe" presence only strengthens the case that this group is not sufficiently notable for a WP article.  Having a WP article in this case amounts to using WP as an advertisement for the group.  Tomer TALK  19:23, July 13, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.