Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetLinkInternational


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

MetLinkInternational

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I cannot find in depth coverage in independent reliable sources for this online project. Has been tagged for lack of sources since June 2007. MakeSense64 (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment May meet WP:GNG, e.g., , . -- Trevj (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 14:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Only minor coverage. Drmies (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven   Zhang  Join the DR army! 03:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Undoubtedly worthy, but sources are not there yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC).
 * Question Then on what basis have you concluded that it is "worthy" ? MakeSense64 (talk) 07:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Royal Meteorological Society as not enough sources for stand alone article.--Pontificalibus (talk) 12:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.