Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetVUW


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

MetVUW

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The article has been here for six years and there still doesn't appear to be in-depth coverage in independent sources. There are a few blog threads and this, but nothing that looks like notability. PROD reverted. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge with Victoria University or if a minor faculty then Delete NealeFamily (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. No WP:RS to fulfill WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - There's info at stuff.co.nz. The oldest news artice I found -- -- is one news article that counts as significant coverage, but I couldn't get a URL for it. The topic probably could be covered in the Victoria University of Wellington, so merge and redirect as an alternative to or interpretation of weak keeping. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 13:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.