Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetaMorpho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of notability provided. Other keep reasons centred mainly around WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is not a valid argument at WP:AFD. PeterSymonds (talk)  14:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

MetaMorpho

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Software with no evidence of notability from WP:RS. Pretty much anything I can find is about Metamorpho (the comic book character). -- Kinu t /c  01:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Tihanyi (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Is sourced; more notable than any comic-book character. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 04:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete PROD wasn't even contested "properly" (no attempt to discuss was even made just a simple removement of the tag) only an assertion of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS in an edit summary. Article doesn't assert notability and reads like an advert for a website that apparently uses said technology. No qualms about starting anew with reliable 3rd party sources (not saying the non-link reference aren't reliable) and full assertion of notability. And really the comic-book character mention above adds nothing to the discussion of the merits of this article at all. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesnt appear to be notable. possibly consider a redirect to Metamorpho as a mispelling. -- neon white user page talk 23:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: More details and secondary refrerences are provided: an award, a link to the system's press page and web statistics proving that MetaMorpho technology and the site based on it have rather high relevance at least for Hungarians. Please note that most references to MetaMorpho technology are in Hungarian.
 * There are no more references than there were previously (three), just multiple external links to the same website strewn in there. The only thing added that may assert notability is the eFestival award; however, that alone does not seem to be sufficient per WP:N. -- Kinu t /c  18:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: More refrences to lectures hold on international conferences about MetaMorpho are added. However we argue that the relevancy of MetaMorpho is primary determined by the big number of Hungarian users who use MetaMorpho. Using this technology they not only can but they really do read the English web pages. We think it is worth to be mentioned at Wikipedia since  webforditas.hu is a tool to read Wikipedia. The high number of articles in important Hungarian newspapers remained unnoticed (30 in 3 years), likely because they are in Hungarian. This is actually what gives the importance of the English-Hungarian machine translation (Hungarians purely read or write in other languages). Tihanyi   (talk) 08:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Since similar machine translator pages like Apertium, OpenLogos, GramTrans exist. Tihanyi (talk) 08:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note that OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for keeping. I've also changed a couple of your keeps to comments for clarity sake. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.