Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metabrowsing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Cool Hand Luke 23:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Metabrowsing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

disputed PROD for NN- new search/browse method for the web, suspected neologism delete Cornell Rockey 20:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * strong keep The references are sufficient to prove the use, and it is just as significant a concept as metasearching, which has long had an article. Basic concept, but article will need much expansion soon.DGG 02:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep. The term has been used in press an journal articles, however I'm worried that a walled garden is being created by the single purpose account Tony343, and this article is focused on Quickbrowse.  I'd like to see it cover when the other players in this market opened for business and closed up shop.  It should also discuss how the technology works. John Vandenberg 23:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep Though the subject of the article fits the definition of a neologism, the WP standards do not prohibit all neologisms. Per the guidelines this subject seems to be among the specific exceptions, and the concept is broad enough that this article can be broader than a mere dictionary definition.  --Kevin Murray 16:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Addhoc 21:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.