Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metacritic game rankings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 18:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Metacritic game rankings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article in its entirety lists the games listed on Metacritic. Has no notability, has no source. Maybe not a copyright violation, but it just copies listings from another website. Soetermans. T / C 07:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Like you say, no references and not exactly notable. If it serves no purpose, then it should be deleted. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Unneeded given that they can be accessed on both Metacritic and the game articles themselves. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. So while this list has no sources, it obviously could. Metacritic keeps lists by genre as well as the overall rankings, but the point remains that there is no significant coverage of these "top lists" themselves. I'll add that these lists are indiscriminate collections of information when there is no rationale for cutting off each sublist at ten items and that I don't see the rationale for adding the user scores, which are fickle user-contributed content. Eye close font awesome.svg czar  ♔  13:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.   czar  ♔  14:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge to List of games considered the best. Tezero (talk) 18:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOT. If you want to see the top ten games at Metacritic, got to Metacritic, there's no reason we'd have a Wikipedia article for it. Sergecross73   msg me   14:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.