Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaevolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Metaevolution
Seems to be an advert for a non-notable book (see external link). Mike Peel 12:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Metadelete. 1900 ghits, I seriously doubt that this would be the word used to describe the evolution of the universe. I'd prefer "standard model". MER-C 13:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unles shown it is not a NN neologism. Pavel Vozenilek 13:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per points above. PJM 13:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Whoever coined this term has no idea what the prefix 'meta' means, and I have never, ever seen it used in science. With the one reference being to a site that supposedly explains scientific topics in layman's terms, I doubt it wasn't just made up in that one article. -Amarkov babble 23:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.