Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Bulletin PLC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Some cleanup has been made by Shalom, but further help is necessary. Non-admin closure.  Boricua  e  ddie  23:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Metal Bulletin PLC

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There are no sources cited for this article, and the main contributor is Special/User:Metalbul, which suggests a WP:COI issue. It may be a non-notable company. There are only about 75 unique links to the main page found by Google. On the other hand, the article claims the company has been around since 1913. So I'm of the opinion that this is a non-notable company, but it's a bit borderline. eaolson 14:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Plenty of reliable sources talking about this company, e.g.     JulesH 20:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Boricuaeddie  hábleme 17:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep and clean up The conflict of interest is there, but so is the notability. A little bushwhacking will do a lot to enhance the article's neutrality. Shalom Hello 04:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per JulesH - Fordan (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.