Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Face


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete (5d; 4 do not delete, three of which were from first-time editors). Mindmatrix 16:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Metal Face
Not notable. —jiy (talk) 11:10, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable and probably vanity --Mecanismo 11:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Do not deleteBand is notable a good contribution.--MOina 16:57, 9 December 2005 (UTC) (User's first edit.—jiy (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  19:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Delete. You can call me Al 19:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * DO NOT DELETE. A lot of time and effort went in to this page, and it is obvious that MF has a devoted following considering that there is a link to their Myspace which has credible songs listed for playing.--Zeegloo 10:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Everyone can create a MySpace account, so that's no proof of notoriety. The ammount of time and efford which a user invests in a wikipedia article isn't proof of notoriety. Everything indicates that the page is pure vanity. The existence of an account in a social networking site and the fact that the article is some unlisted wikipedia user's pet project aren't at all justifications for not deleting the article. --Mecanismo | Talk 15:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment to MecanismoSweet, fag. --Nelson,P 20:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC) (User's first edit.—jiy (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete, more bandcruft. Meets the most important criterion for non-notability: a myspace page. Stifle 23:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Plenty of notable groups have myspace accounts, such as Sigur Rós, Hawthorne Heights...what's your point?--Zeegloo 00:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Being new to Wikipedia, I have not A) had the time to make a profile for myself and B) Do not know its benefits.--Zeegloo 00:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Metal Face is notable and should be left alone. Dox 2005 was a progressive leap for alternative rock and is definitely significant. --Kiomana 16:31, 12 December 2005 (UTC) (User's first edit.—jiy (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC))
 * Comment By the way, I am not a member of the band, just a loyal fan who wants to spread the love.--Zeegloo 04:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Give me time to make this more of a "neurtal" article.
 * Don't Delete notable band with significant contributions to the music scene--LABrun 16:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC) (User's first edit.—jiy (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete per nom. — Wackymacs 21:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.