Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Marines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawing as Keep and I'm willing to add the reviews myself, likely later tonight (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  18:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Metal Marines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unfortunately this is still questionable at best and it's likely because it's from the pre-Internet boom so any sources are likely both archive and also Japanese. I have searched including with the Japanese-listed name Militia but I found nothing; the Japanese Wiki has extra information but nothing else convincing to help improve this (at least, from what I comprehend). The best my searches basically found was only this 2007 review. SwisterTwister  talk  04:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister  talk  05:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – IGN review:, GameSpot review: , Nintendolife review: , AllGame has a review score, although no written review: , Mobygames page lists a bunch of magazine reviews: . Nintendo Power also reviewed it according to GameRankings: . --The1337gamer (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as searches confirm notability, meets WP:GNG. SwisterTwister, did you do any research at all? ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. (1) Assume good faith—it's silly to expect everyone to automatically know the ins and outs of historical game searches. (2) MobyGames is the best place to find listings of old magazine reviews, and old magazines are the best place to find information on games from the 90s, as the content hasn't digitized well. On the basis of the MobyGames mags alone, we can say the topic is safely notable. czar  08:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is likely sufficient coverage to meet the minimum notability threshold from just the materials in our Reference Library. See EGM (Oct. 1993), PC Gamer (May 1995), and Super Play (Oct. 1993). One good way to discover sources like that on-Wiki is by scanning through the page's WhatLinksHere link and looking for incoming links from the WP:VG Reference Library or from Wikipedia's Shared Resources page. -Thibbs (talk) 19:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.