Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaledge Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Metaledge Records

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am unable to find any evidence at all that this passes WP:GNG. A search for this reveals mostly Myspace/blogs but no RS coverage. It was also written by a COI author.  Triplestop  x3  20:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 20:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:CORP. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 12:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Reconsider the article it has been rewritten and has more verifiable sources(198.68.16.40 (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC))
 * Keep The article has been rewritten and verified by verifiable sources. The label has released a major artist Lionsheart whose frontman fronted RCA multiplatinum Grim Reaper and developing a tribute album w/Neil Young's blessing is notable (Contributions/198.68.16.40 (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)) — 198.68.16.40 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note, the above user appears to be the same person who made the article and the same person as "Texasmusician1978". Please refrain from using multiple accounts in this way. And note, releasing just one known album and a tribute not yet even released is not sufficient sign of notability; there still is no significant coverage. And your sources on the page are not RS or are only trivial mentions.  Triplestop  x3  18:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as insufficiently notable. In addition to the above arguments, Google returns 48 results for "Metaledge Records" -wiki -myspace -youtube and no apparent signs of significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. — Rankiri (talk) 00:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * d: No reliable sources of substance. Pigman ☿/talk 03:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * weak keep Seems to be a semi new record label, but it looks legit. I found this. Personal opinion follows Besides, I kinda like the music ;-) - Drew Smith What I've done 09:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't know if it should be kept or deleted, but here are some sources  (proof of reliability ),, , , , ,  (though it is about a band that they signed). Judge them for yourself, reliable or not. The Weak Willed 13:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think that any of these sources satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG. and  appear to be press releases issued by the company.


 * Delete They seem to be a non notable(not important) group ,They do not deserve an article .--Notedgrant (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this recrord label. Joe Chill (talk) 19:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is a lot of 'record labels' listed on this site which have not even one reference. I think we should keep it fair. However you vote, its your choice but I just want the users to check other articles(198.68.16.40 (talk) 20:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC))
 * Changed to "comment"; user already voted.  Triplestop  x3  19:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.