Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metallurgical education


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Metallurgical education

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is a spin-out from metallurgy because user:philly jawn did not want to see the education section removed from the metallurgy article, however this is a non-notable subject and there is broad consensus that the article shouldn't exist per Talk:Metallurgy/Archives/2023/December and Talk:Metallurgy. Wizard191 (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC) Furthermore, after looking at the talk page in question, consensus not to have an article on this subject does not seem to exist. RadManCF &#x2622; open frequency 14:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep We have articles on engineering education, physics education, chemestry education, etc. This article could definitely be improved, but is worth keeping.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 05:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 05:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject appears to be important enough and notable enough to have it's own article separate from metallurgy itself. Silver  seren C 05:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I see that you added a lot of ELs, but after glancing at the first three they don't seem to support the article at all; they just seem to mention the phrase "metal education" or "metallurgical education". A mention of the phrase does not assert notability; see notability point 1. Wizard191 (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment For what's it worth, in the former USSR, a lot of univeristies and technical colleges were called Gorno-metallurgichesky insititut (Горно-металлургический институт, Institute of Mining and Metallurgy) and Gorno-metallurgichesky technicum'' (Горно-металлургический техникум, College of Mining and Metallurgy). Ru.wiki search comes up with plenty of institutions. In some company towns that was the only institution of higher education. In practice, of course, beyond mining engineering and metallurgy they often offered other engineering (and sometimes even non-engineering) programs as well, and many have now been renamed as "technical university" etc. (Donbas State Technical University, Kazakh National Technical University). -- Vmenkov (talk) 03:52, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.