Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaphysical Astronomy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 22:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Metaphysical Astronomy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON at the very least. The article is in the form of an essay or original research. The term itself was coined two years ago and hardly picked up anywhere. Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree with the above comments. Aldebarium (talk) 20:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism and horrifically bad sourcing. Neutralitytalk 22:48, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - we do not help popularized new terms, nor do we publish original research. Everybody in 2019 knows that. Bearian (talk) 20:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as in its current form, seems to be an essay more than anything. Even if it wasn't written like an essay, I can't find more than one or two notable sources on this. Sam-2727 (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete; it might be a notable term, but all of the articles were published before its supposed coining. A term by the name of 'metaphysical astronomy' could be notable, but the one that could be notable isn't this one. Happy Festivities! //  J 947  (c) 21:26, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.