Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaphysically wrinkle-free


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Metaphysically wrinkle-free

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A contested prod, this article is little more than a neologism. Claims are made (see bottom paragraph) of being something other than a neologism, but the reasoning is weak, to say the least. Badger Drink (talk) 04:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO, as neologism, and WP:FICT, as minor component of fictional work. --John Nagle (talk) 04:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prod2'd this article. It's WP:OR. Only 1 usable news hit, and it's only used as someone's nickname. No secondary sources. Fails WP:RS, WP:V. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this piece of original research. As far as I can gather, the phrase is only known for appearing in a single movie. Any other appearances of the phrase are non notable. So Awesome (talk) 04:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. non-notable, agree with John Nagle above - minor part of a fictional work. - Special-T (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable secondary sources, non-notable neologism. STORMTRACKER    94  Go Irish! 14:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 03:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.