Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metastupid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  Voice of All  @ ''' 04:18, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

metastupid
This article has been speedily deleted several times. Its various incarnations have satisfied criteria for speedy deletion A1, A3, and A6. However, the current incarnation doesn't match any speedy deletion criterion. It is, however, a stub article about a non-subject (the title being an adjective not a noun) with no possibility of expansion, that is original research with a non-word as its title to boot. Uncle G 17:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Also, this is only a dict def even if yiou accept the coined word. Perhaps the page should be protected after deletion this time. DES (talk) 18:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Metadelete. neodicdef. BD2412  talk 18:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonword --pgk( talk ) 18:34, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect against recreation. -- Kjkolb 20:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Encourage research / expansion of idea contained within. Possibly create meta-stupidity to qualify as noun and set metastupid to redirect page as per policy? So many resources are spent on meta-stupidity, that awareness and understanding of this should be fostered by spending time working towards a great article on such topic.-- Secretlondon 21:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN this version. It made me giggle. Obviously not for Wikipedia, though. --Jacquelyn Marie 22:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Ryan Norton T 23:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I hate to throw this away because it so epitomizes how I feel about some of the articles I find here. I'm with Jacquelyn Marie in that it MUST have a home on BJAODN. Denni &#9775; 03:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Dottore So 09:52, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The fact that this isn't a valid speedy candidate annoys me. --Ashenai (talk) 09:53, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.