Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metawire (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Metawire
Non-notable and doesn't include why it merits inclusion in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a junkyard. Delete Ardenn 15:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RGTraynor 15:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looking over the previous debate from July 2005, I find that the "keep" arguments no longer ring true.  The company's current downed status, indicates some loss of what previous notability they may have had. -MrFizyx 16:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. -- Grafikm_fr 16:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Rory 0 96 (block) 18:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  Funky Monkey    (talk)   01:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep under WP:SOFTWARE, Metawire's woes are recounted on a number of online forums, it'd be nice if someone would pull the whole story together; that won't happen if we just remove it. -- AlexWCovington  (talk) 01:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you volunteering? (There have been no significant edits of the article since July '05.) -MrFizyx 19:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.