Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methalol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Methalol
Prod removed by author; I stand by my original claim that this is a NN, unverifiable neologism, unacceptable per WP:NEO. Delete (|--   UlT i MuS  08:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the fact that none of the ghits refer to this usage. David Mestel(Talk) 08:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would've suggested a merge was it not for the Ghits David provided. This is an utter neologism. - Mgm|(talk) 11:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fascinating but not acceptable on WP:NEO anyway. --Nigel (Talk) 12:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:V... not even funny enough for BJAODN. A worthy candidate for WP:SNOW. -- Kinu t /c  14:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - the internet forums are full of passing fad phrases that shine for a week. This one doesn't appear to have even made it that far. -- Whpq 16:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, silly protologism. NawlinWiki 17:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nawlin &mdash; Khoikhoi 02:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a completely useless article about an unverifiable neologism. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "'Don't Delete'" - it's funny!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.180.214 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: WP:ILIKEIT isn't an inclusion criterion. -- Kinu t /c  13:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.