Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methodism (methodology)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Methodism (methodology)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unclear topic, orphaned, unsourced Hazhk Talk to me 21:10, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

It's unclear exactly what this topic is. It has no links from other articles, and a google search doesn't identify what a "Methodist methodological approach" might be. This might be merged with Methodism (philosophy), but it's hard to tell whether this is the same topic or not. -- Hazhk Talk to me 21:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 4.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  21:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Leaning Delete - I think this article could be something, but where it stands now I say delete because it has no sources and is only 1 sentence. I agree with the points made by Hazhk. Newsjunky12 (talk) 22:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC) Proud member of the Association of Deletionist Wikipedians.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Delete - if this bears any mentioning at all it needs to be put in a much bigger article. Such narrow topics do not deserve their own free-standing articles. I also feel like someone just made this up when they made this article.  LazyBastard Guy  19:14, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, you probably could have PRODded this article successfully. It doesn't seem like anyone would put up a fuss about it.  LazyBastard Guy  19:22, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.