Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metin Sofuoğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus. However, this is only a 1 sentence stub so if somebody wants to write a new article with sources then be my guest. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Metin Sofuoğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found no indication that this individual meets any notability criteria. According to the WKF his world ranking is 597. He's had some success as a junior/cadet which, according to the medals chart in the article, he was still competing as earlier this year, but I don't believe that's sufficient to show notability. The article also lacks independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —Papaursa (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This individual clearly fails WP:MANOTE since junior events are not considered notable (even world championship events for juniors have been deleted). Astudent0 (talk) 12:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks reliable sources and fails to show notability. Jakejr (talk) 13:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: There may be sources in Turkish, but I cannot guarantee the how good they (like this one are. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:02, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * To be barely ranked in the top 600 of an organization and meet none of the specific notability criteria of WP:MANOTE seems sufficient to show subject is not notable. Jakejr (talk) 16:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.