Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetroJet Flight 2710


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Boeing 737 rudder issues. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

MetroJet Flight 2710

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable incident. Isn't a hull loss. Doesn't meet WP:AIRCRASH criteria. Might be worth noting i 737 article only because of that aircraft's history of rudder deflections. William 21:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  -William 21:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  -William 21:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -William 21:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Boeing 737 rudder issues - non-notable outside the context of that article, fails WP:AIRCRASH and WP:GNG for a stand-alone article. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment A redirect is fine with me. The rudder issues article already makes mention of this incident.- William 00:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 03:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect per Bushranger looks like a reasonable resolution. For a non-crash incident, a stand alone article is justified only in exceptional cases, and I cannot see that is the case here. However, the incident is clearly of relevance in a wider issue. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect Agree with Bushranger's assessment of referenced WP guidelines and proposed solution. M1rtyn (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.