Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metrodigi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Metrodigi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparent lack of notability. An online search reveals little or no substantial coverage. The sources provided are press releases, mentions in passing, and a couple of failed verifications that may relate to a product of theirs, or a book produced using a product of theirs, but notability isn't inherited. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is the kind of thing where I feel like they created an article on themself a year or so too early or I might have let it slide after a bit of cleanup. Author has been honest about identity which I do respect, but thanks to Largo Plazo for spotting those citations which don't mention that the award is actually for work this company did. Nonetheless, this isn't the worst case I've seen and if Ms. Scioli can dig up more reliable sources on her company I might switch my vote. Blythwood (talk) 23:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  01:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  01:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  01:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as questionable from the current article. Delete for now at best, SwisterTwister   talk  23:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.