Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay Hong Kong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Amkgp  💬  15:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay Hong Kong

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This hotel is WP:Run-of-the-mill and fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG Wikiwriter700 (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - could be expanded significantly using the sources here Spiderone  10:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.     </li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Metropark Hotel Causeway Bay Hong Kong to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 01:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)</li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Cunard; there are enough sources covering this; article needs improving but not deleting Spiderone  08:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I believe this article can be improved with the many sources that Cunard has listed above.   Oshawott 12  ==== Talk to me!  08:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:Run-of-the-mill is an essay and "Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community". Andrew🐉(talk) 11:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep (and improve, sure) — I note that the nominator has been proposing AfD on numerous articles on hotels (I can't help wondering why?), always on the basis of the run-of-the-mill argument, which in some cases does indeed apply (FWIW); IMO, it does not here. Alone the takeover of this hotel by the spooks makes it interesting and notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.