Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Community Church of Manchester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Metropolitan Community Church. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Metropolitan Community Church of Manchester

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There appears to be little of notability about this church. A discussion at WT:GM appears to reveal there may be a consensus to delete Pit-yacker (talk) 12:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this church. Joe Chill (talk) 01:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge: into Metropolitan Community Church as the local congregation is not notable.  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ TALK 08:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect. I think a case could be made that a good article is possible but as yet no one has put in the work. A church around for as long is certainly likely to have numerous media mentions et al but for now just redirect to main until a list of MCC churches is pulled together. -- Banj e  b oi   17:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If sources exist, i didn't find them, not even enough to make a redirect worthwhile. It is just one, small, not very old, local congregation of a national church. Merging paragraphs from every local congregation into the parent church would make the parent a very poor article. Yob  Mod  10:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I think searching under "MCC Manchester" may help although different names certainly may also be used. -- Banj e  b oi   10:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.