Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mettalurgix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge. Taking into account that he is not a reccuring character, I've redirected to Asterix and the Golden Sickle, where he is already mentioned. It is misspelled but it is not a farfetched misspelling. And redirects are cheap. --Ezeu 14:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Mettalurgix
This is an extremely minor character in the Asterix series, he exists as a plot device & visual gag in one minor story only and is never mentioned again, all the information really needed (if any is) is included on Obelix' page (their distant relationship being the ONLY thing that makes him at ALL noteworthy); also his name (page name) is misspelled (should be "Metallurgix"); finally, though not a reason to delete but rather a reason to not worry about deletion, no pages link to it Invisifan 20:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge to Recurring characters in Asterix. -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 21:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. He's not even a recurring character; why merge it there? TCC (talk) (contribs) 21:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or Delete There are less notable fictional characters in wikipedia (given the notablity of the asterix series and the notable use of cleverly funny names, like "getafix" and "*" asterix) but this one certainly doesn't need his own page. --Nick Y. 01:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Getcrunk. Nothing to suggest that this character needs an article of his own. --BrownHairedGirl 08:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * He is already mentioned in the Obelix article as a distant relative & in the appropriate book description -- he is not a recurring character in any sense -- in fact he's never mentioned again so unless we add a minor 1-shot but maybe interesting character category I don't think he should be merged.--Invisifan 12:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.