Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mette Laursen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Mette Laursen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have been unable to find sufficient references to establish notability for this person. It is possible that there are news sources not visible to me; if sufficient evidence of notability can be found by others, I'll happily withdraw this nomination. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is also an AfC submission for this article: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mette Laursen. It represents an earlier stage of the article, before I added some references, and has not been resubmitted, but it should be noted that it also exists. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 07:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete I agree with Candleabracadabra (talk). Certainly doesn't pass WP:GNG nor WP:BIO. scope_creep talk 18:11, 06 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.