Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexican Federal Highway 26


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 08:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Mexican Federal Highway 26

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't think this highway actually exists. There's no information on its location in the article, it doesn't seem to be in the national map that's cited, and I couldn't find any other sources that mention it. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Mexico. Shellwood (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - I repeat what I said on AFD Mexican Federal Highway 18. Please see its navbox.  As far as I can tell,these are all done the same done way by . Note the navbox at the bottom of the page. Also the talk page banners indicate this is ongoing project of both  WikiProject Mexico, and WikiProject Highways.   Category:Mexican Federal Highways. Stubs are a vital part of Wikipedia. Disagreements with that should probably be addressed to the individual projects overseeing this. — Maile  (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, a random look at various entries of highways, it looks like the sources are all Spanish-language PDF.  Inasmuch as the sourcing seems to be like that in all I've looked at, perhaps this really is a project issue, not an AFD issue.  What's the point in deleting a handful, when all the articles use that PDF sourcing as a basis? — Maile  (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you please clarify how "Stubs are a vital part of Wikipedia" justifies an article on something that may not exist? Stubs without sources are not vital. I did note the navbox, which links List of Mexican Federal Highways – this does not have number 26 on it! Nor does the eswiki version. This is not a useful !vote if you can't actually refute the nominator's concern or provide sources to establish notability. Reywas92Talk 00:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is absolutely nothing in the article that shows why it should remain as it is. There's no content in the article & as the nomination states, the citations are not helping.
 * GeographicAccountant (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Putting in an actual !vote now since I was hoping someone would find a source first... No evidence of notability or even existence. Reywas92Talk 14:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Yet another highway not proven to be independently notable. I've said it before and I'll say it again: create a single article on Mexican highways, and should any individual highways be demonstrably notable, spin off articles from there. Cortador (talk) 12:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.