Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexico and the World Bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp  💬  19:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Mexico and the World Bank

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article would require a complete rewrite to match our standards (sources, language, style, structure). Considering that there is nothing really striking about the relationship of Mexico and the World Bank, I don't think that we should keep this piece. If editors feel like some information needs to be preserved, it could be merged into the "Economy" section of our article on Mexico. wikitigresito (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, I wouldn't say that the need to rewrite an article disqualifies it from being an article outright. Yes, this article could use some work, but it is a notable topic that is, in my opinion, better served as its own article. -Navarre0107 (talk) 17:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve The article definitely needs some work, of that there is no doubt. But it's nothing that ten minutes of editing couldn't resolve, even if it means ending up with a shorter and simpler article. There are any number of similar 'Country and the WB' articles in the category, so I don't see why Mexico's should be deleted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep We have a whole series of articles about individual countries and their relationship with the WB. That’s a notable topic because it is much discussed in multiple sources. If the article needs improving that’s easily done. Mccapra (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.