Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meyer Seewald


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Jewish Community Watch. Remember to attribute the merged text when performing merges. Otherwise it'll look like your own original contribution in the edit history. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹   23:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Meyer Seewald

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet WP bio notability requirements. Sources do not meet depth requirements. Most WP worthy information is on the JCW organization. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Jewish Community Watch. Note, I have copied and pasted all the contents of this article to this section now, so nothing will be lost. At this point Meyer Seewald and the Jewish Community Watch that he founded are synonymous and one and the same basically. This article is a good example of a WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Maybe with the passage of time there may be a reason to justify such a WP:CONTENTFORK but at this time there really isn't. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)




 * Redirect - what should be merged has already been merged. Agree with all of the commentary above. A good result which ensures we don't lose any valuable content.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.