Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meze Headphones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep now that's it's cleaned up a bit -- Y not? 18:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Meze Headphones

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Corporate spam, this looks like. Key indicator: this article is the sole contribution of Roseradtke. Rose Radtke is a "Social Media Marketer". - Biruitorul Talk 14:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. nothing in gnews. LibStar (talk) 06:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Quiet, quiet keep No opinion. Their products have been reviewed by Wired, CNET and Thrillist. I've ditched the spammy bits. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  01:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. Not particularly prominent products per se, but I've seen a few reviews so I guess it can be presumed to be notable per GNG. The article is not spammy in its current form. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A few reviews don't muster CORP, so I'm going to have to say delete on GNG and N grounds, the product may go with it in this case as there is no place to merge. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep A few full reviews are exactly what shows notability for products, per the GNG. The wired and the CNet reviews in particular are  full reviews, focused on these particular products, and are therefore exactly what is needed. (what doesn't count is brief notes in a group review, so all reviews need to be critically inspected. These pass.) Companies making notable products are notable, if the article is focused on the products--it's better than trying to cover individual headphone models.  DGG ( talk ) 06:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks notable enough and sufficient content for a short article. --Michig (talk) 09:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.