Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MgNet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

MgNet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:OR. Only the first reference (a research paper) even mentions this software. Article reads like a journal article. No substantial coverage found; Google results are about a variety of other topics. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 02:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 02:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Danstronger (talk) 03:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Sifting out citations to the research paper that are by the original authors themselves and/or aren't peer-reviewed, there isn't enough to show that this software has become widely used or remarkably influential. There's also a pretty clear conflict of interest, what with the article talking about "our research" and apparently being created by someone who coauthored 3 of the 5 references. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 02:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find anything to suggest this meets WP:GNG. Charitably, it may be too soon? Also, could consider redirecting to Jinchao Xu who is the senior author on the paper describing MgNet (I think). Ajpolino (talk) 20:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.