Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mi-Case


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Mi-Case

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a relatively insignificant software. As far as I can see, its only coverage in media is one review, and a press release from Maryland government. "Used by 30 customers in the UK" is a sign that it shouldn't have a WP article. — Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. — Naddruf  (talk ~ contribs) 06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.